We have 62 active listings on the market in La Canada. 1 of them is new:
http://itech.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Itech&PRGNAME=MLSLogin&ARGUMENT=HFDsIaPvYtvwH3EvXf%2Fp1EP2U6Bo5dRm0sancRmNWdY%3D&KeyRid=1&Include_Search_Criteria=on
Not really new, as it was on the market from early 2008 through February of this year. It started last year at $4,895,000 and came down to $3,995,000 after the new year. Why put it on now, right before the holidays for slightly less...I can't explain. The house has spectacular views. Not much more to say about it other than that the fabulous view was overshadowed by the baskets of laundry on the bedroom floor and the spotted bananas and loaves of bread on the kitchen counter. I don't consider myself nit-picky or overly tidy, but if you are going to caravan your home 17 days before Christmas (or any day for that matter), put the laundry and the food away. Out of sight...gone. When your home has a wonderful feature, like a view, brand new floors, a nice pool, you don't want the take-away to be rotten fruit or unfolded underwear. It seems odd in this era of "Designed to Sell" that we even need to have this conversation.
4 homes went into escrow this week:
http://itech.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Itech&PRGNAME=MLSLogin&ARGUMENT=HFDsIaPvYtvwH3EvXf%2Fp1JVQEDGaxgWBOk666%2Br1c8c%3D&KeyRid=1&Include_Search_Criteria=on
5138 Redwillow last sold in 2006 for $880,000. It was listed in 2007 for $969,000 (didn't sell) then was up for lease. It came on in October for $869,000, then reduced to $849,000 before selling. Proof that the low end is very buoyant and has not been hit as hard as the high-end (let's assume it is in escrow for $800...less than a 10% drop since the height of the market). 339 Santa Inez took a few weeks but found a buyer. Nice lot, loads of charm and in the sweet spot of the market price-wise. 5254 Alta Canyada last sold in 2005 for $1,060,000. At the time it was a nasty 1400 square foot house with a less than perfect lot. Back then it did not matter that a large portion of the 16,450 square foot lot was actually an easement over Linda Vista on the east side of the property and that the usable lot was under 10,000. It was even in the agents remarks. The buyers added more than 1,000 square feet and put it on the market in 2007 for $1,650,000 then steadily rode the market down, with ne'er a mention of the fact that most of the yard was actually a paved street.. It expired in March when it had been dropped to $1,295,000. At that point, one can assume that the owners threw up their hands and let it go. Now a short sale, it is finally in escrow and not a moment too soon as it was scheduled for auction tomorrow. 4411 Woodleigh, a market casualty, sold in 2006 for $4,000,000. It is in a great location and has grand public rooms perfect for entertaining, but the 2009 buyer pool was not impressed. It came on in February for $4.2 and has inched its way down. At the current price, it finally attracted multiple offers and actually has a solid back-up offer.
We had 4 closings in La Canada this week:
http://itech.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Itech&PRGNAME=MLSLogin&ARGUMENT=HFDsIaPvYtvwH3EvXf%2Fp1Hnsmv7oOzfZ%2Fr3I5ugrpYM%3D&KeyRid=1&Include_Search_Criteria=on
1123 Inverness was listed in August for $999,000, went into escrow and fell out. It was then reduced $100,000 and was in escrow again a week later. 660 Pomander, a personal favorite, sold in the first week with multiple offers but did not go over asking. 334 Saint Katherine came on in October and also had multiples. Tons of potential with an amazing lot. 3751 Normandy Ct. was listed for $2,495,000 in May but dropped to $1,995,000 a month later. When it dropped to $1,799,000 it went into escrow, fell out and then finally found its buyer. It is a very nice house but because of its remote location, it sold for $294 per square foot. A great deal for a buyer who values privacy.
Cheers!